高级检索

轻型与低碳目标下装配式墙体保温材料应用分析

Analysis of the Application of Prefabricated Wall Insulation Materials Under Lightweight and Low-carbon Goals

  • 摘要: 针对采煤沉陷区地质条件复杂性与建筑轻量化需求的耦合挑战,本研究以装配式建筑墙体系统为研究对象,聚焦轻质低碳材料与结构协同优化机制,旨在建立适用于特殊地质环境下兼顾轻量化与低碳化的墙体保温材料科学选型方法。建立参数化数值模拟,对六类保温材料进行系统对比;构建多维度评估体系,从面密度、隐含碳、运行能碳及经济性等关键指标开展量化分析,划分“轻量化优先”与“低碳化优先”的材料选择策略。研究结果表明:EPS、聚氨酯在轻量化方面表现突出,面密度均可控制在7 kg/m2以内,且EPS面密度指标最优;XPS、STP为低碳化性能最优的两类材料,在总碳排放量低于170 tCO2的建筑设计要求下,可选择的墙体保温厚度适配范围更广。当设定墙体面密度与碳排放量阈值时,超薄型保温材料优选STP,其轻量化与低碳化最佳平衡点对应厚度26 mm;常规厚度保温材料优选聚氨酯,其最佳平衡点对应厚度150 mm,二者均可实现轻量化与低碳化的最优平衡。在存在经济约束的工程场景中,推荐选用EPS作为墙体保温材料;STP因成本偏高应用范围受限,但其保温性能优异,可作为超低能耗建筑墙体保温的理想替代材料。本研究提出的多维度评估方法与材料优选策略,可为寒冷地区采煤沉陷治理区装配式建筑墙体保温材料选型提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract: Addressing the coupled challenges posed by the complexity of geological conditions in coal mining subsidence areas and the demand for lightweight construction, this study focuses on prefabricated building wall systems. It concentrates on the collaborative optimization mechanism of lightweight low-carbon materials and structures, aiming to establish a scientific selection method for wall insulation materials that balances lightweight and low-carbon considerations in special geological environments. A parametric numerical simulation is established to systematically compare six types of insulation materials. A multi-dimensional evaluation system is constructed to conduct quantitative analysis from key indicators such as areal density, embodied carbon, operational embodied carbon, and economy, dividing material selection strategies into "lightweight priority" and "low-carbon priority". The research findings indicate that EPS and polyurethane excel in lightweight performance, with areal densities controllable within 7 kg/m2, with EPS exhibiting the best areal density index. XPS and STP are the two materials with the best low-carbon performance, offering a wider range of suitable wall insulation thicknesses under the architectural design requirement of total carbon emissions below 170 tCO2. When setting thresholds for wall areal density and carbon emissions, STP is preferred for ultra-thin insulation materials, with its optimal balance point between lightweight and low-carbon corresponding to a thickness of 26 mm; polyurethane is preferred for conventional thickness insulation materials, with its optimal balance point corresponding to a thickness of 150 mm. Both can achieve the optimal balance between lightweight and low-carbon. In engineering scenarios with economic constraints, EPS is recommended as the wall insulation material; STP, due to its high cost, has a limited application range, but its excellent insulation performance makes it an ideal alternative for wall insulation in ultra-low energy consumption buildings. The multi-dimensional evaluation method and material selection strategy proposed in this study provide a scientific basis for the selection of wall insulation materials for prefabricated buildings in cold regions with coal mining subsidence areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回