高级检索

公铁并行钢轨防护栏安全性研究

Research on the Safety of Parallel Rail Protection Fence for Public and Railway Vehicles

  • 摘要: 为评估公铁并行段钢轨防护栏安全性能,预防车辆越栏与铁路碰撞事故,以及为工程应用及安全判定提供依据,特开展本研究。以广深Ⅲ线3处公铁并行段为样本,现场量测防护栏几何参数(柱间距、柱高、梁宽)并测其硬度;截取材料做试件,通过室内单轴抗拉试验获取屈服强度、极限抗拉强度;将防护栏概化为梁柱结构,推演冲击工况抗冲击能量计算方法(取0.9力学参数折减系数);构建1800 kg轿车与防护栏三维模型,设4种碰撞速度模拟。结果表明:防护栏几何参数较统一(均值分别为200.4 cm、78.8 cm、33.5 cm),硬度均值为416(离散小),屈服强度为678 MPa,极限抗拉强度为1018 MPa,抗冲击能量为50.5 kJ(柱冲击为不利工况),护栏等级为一(C)级防护;在碰撞速度为30 km/h~40 km/h时,车辆变形可控,而在速度超过60 km/h的碰撞中,车辆易失控,且存在倾覆或越栏风险。既有防护栏抗拉强度高、安全等级达一(C)级,车速为40 km/h以内可防越栏;其为非标准结构,无推广性且需定期检查;新建/改造护栏可参照现行行业标准,乡村无等级公路护栏参照四级公路标准。

     

    Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety performance of steel guardrails on sections where roads and railways run parallel, to prevent vehicles from breaching the guardrails and colliding with trains, and to provide engineering application and safety assessment references. Three samples from the Guangzhou-Shenzhen III line road-rail parallel sections were selected. On-site measurements of guardrail geometric parameters (post spacing, post height, beam width) and hardness were taken. Material specimens were sampled and tested in the laboratory for uniaxial tensile properties to determine yield strength and ultimate tensile strength. The guardrails were simplified as beam-column structures to derive a method for calculating impact energy under collision conditions (using a 0.9 mechanical parameter reduction factor). A 3D model of a 1800 kg car and the guardrail was built, and four collision speeds were simulated. The guardrails showed relatively consistent geometric parameters (average values: 200.4 cm, 78.8 cm, 33.5 cm), average hardness 416 (low dispersion), yield strength 678 MPa, and ultimate tensile strength 1018 MPa; calculated impact energy was 50.5 kJ (column impact being the unfavorable scenario), achieving Class One (C) protection. Deformation is controllable at collision speeds of 30 km/h~40 km/h, while speeds above 60 km/h may lead to failure, vehicle overturning, or breaching risks. Existing guardrails have sufficient tensile strength and meet Class One (C) safety standards, preventing vehicles from breaching at speeds within 40 km/h; however, they are non-standard structures, lack general applicability, and require regular inspection. New construction or renovations should refer to current industry standards, and guardrails on ungraded rural roads should follow the fourth-class highway standard.

     

/

返回文章
返回