高级检索

双侧壁导坑法直立核心土宽度优化研究

Optimisation of the Width of the Upright Core Soil for the Double Sidewall Guide Pit Method

  • 摘要: 针对双侧壁导坑法施工中核心土宽度对隧道稳定性的影响,本文以重庆轨道交通15号线二期大断面联络线隧道工程为背景,通过数值模拟方法研究了不同核心土宽度对地表沉降、围岩应力及衬砌应力的作用规律。并利用Abaqus有限元软件对四种不同核心土宽度(1.5 m、2 m、2.5 m、3 m)进行了模拟分析。沉降分析及衬砌应力分析结果表明,核心土宽度存在一个最优值。在本工程中,该最优值为2 m(对应方案2)。当核心土宽度小于2 m时,地表沉降及衬砌应力显著增大,变形也会更加集中,容易诱发隧道结构安全隐患;而当核心土宽度大于2 m时,不仅增加了开挖难度和风险,而且衬砌应力控制效果也不够明显。因此,合理预留2 m的核心土能够在变形控制与施工安全之间取得平衡。本研究可为类似大断面隧道工程的核心土优化设计提供有益的参考和指导意见。

     

    Abstract: In response to the influence of core soil width on tunnel stability during the construction of double-sided wall guide method, this paper takes the Chongqing Rail Transit Line 15 Phase II large section connecting line tunnel project as the background, and studies the effects of different core soil widths on surface settlement, surrounding rock stress, and lining stress through numerical simulation methods. And Abaqus finite element software was used to simulate and analyze four different core soil widths (1.5 m, 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m). The results of settlement analysis and lining stress analysis indicate that there is an optimal value for the width of the core soil. In this project, the optimal value is 2 meters (corresponding to Scheme 2). When the width of core soil is less than 2 m, the surface settlement and lining stress increase significantly, and the deformation will be more concentrated, which is easy to induce the hidden danger of tunnel structure. When the width of the core soil is greater than 2m, it not only increases the difficulty and risk of excavation, but also the effect of lining stress control is not obvious enough.Therefore, a reasonable reserve of 2 meters of core soil can achieve a balance between deformation control and construction safety. This study can provide useful reference and guidance for the optimization design of core soil in similar large section tunnel projects.

     

/

返回文章
返回